On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:08:51AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > I think the fundamental problem is having kFreeBSD in Debian. It's too
> > much extra work and problems for limited benefit to a small number of
> > people. Holding things hostage with "you have to make this work on
> > kFreeBSD too or it won't be allowed at all" arguments will have negative
> > effects beyond just init systems.
> 
> Then you are not talking about Debian. Do you want to create your own
> distribution? Feel free to do that:)

Uoti's point here has long been recognised and accepted *within* Debian:
every architecture bears a cost.  The question as to whether the cost of
kFreeBSD is too much or not is, well, not universally agreed amongst
Debian developers.

<http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_policy.html>


-- 
Jon Dowland


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120306100002.GA27642@debian

Reply via email to