On May 09, Arto Jantunen <vi...@debian.org> wrote:

> In addition to that it would be nice if everyone could agree to not work
> against a certain init implementation (for example by refusing to
> include the startup file for that init when someone else has written one
> and submited it as a wishlist bug).
I definitely refuse to start including random startup files in my 
packages, because this conflicts with the goal of supporting only one 
init system.

> We can return to the "which init is default" discussion when we have
Except for an handful of people, who are mostly motivated by their love 
for the toy ports, the discussion actually was "which init system should 
be supported".

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to