Hi, On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 08:06:43PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 08:39:41PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > > Not any more (hopefully) since I droped the `find -name` approach > > > > which turned out as insufficient (even if very attractive in the > > > > first place). > > > > In that case, the field in mothur's copyright file (and perhaps > > > others) is not valid, as it uses [] wildcards, which are not > > > recognized in Files fields. > > > > Uhmmm, I was not aware of this. Hmmm, this needs to be discussed. > > Any specific reason not to support [] wildcards? Without having dived > > deeply into this I'd consider this as an unneeded restriction. > > Needed or not, it is how the format looks now. > > Please avoid derailing into _development_ of the format.
OK. So Fields-Excluded is currently not part of DEP5 anyway and so I revert my former answer that it fits the Files format because it may contain [] wildcards (and I do not see any problem because of this). I agree with Jonas that discussing the format might be delayed until after Wheezy release. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130116094504.gj17...@an3as.eu