Quoting Andreas Tille (2013-01-16 10:45:04) > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 08:06:43PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 08:39:41PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > > > Not any more (hopefully) since I droped the `find -name` > > > > > approach which turned out as insufficient (even if very > > > > > attractive in the first place). > > > > > > In that case, the field in mothur's copyright file (and perhaps > > > > others) is not valid, as it uses [] wildcards, which are not > > > > recognized in Files fields. > > > > > > Uhmmm, I was not aware of this. Hmmm, this needs to be discussed. > > > Any specific reason not to support [] wildcards? Without having > > > dived deeply into this I'd consider this as an unneeded > > > restriction. > > > > Needed or not, it is how the format looks now. > > > > Please avoid derailing into _development_ of the format. > > OK. So Fields-Excluded is currently not part of DEP5 anyway and so I > revert my former answer that it fits the Files format because it may > contain [] wildcards (and I do not see any problem because of this). > I agree with Jonas that discussing the format might be delayed until > after Wheezy release.
Copyright ile format 1.0 permits unofficial fields, so I disagree with your reasoning to avoid Files-Excluded:. Makes sense to me to a) introduce a new field that can later be adopted in a later revision of the format, but b) reuse existing defined *format* for that new field. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
