Norbert Preining <prein...@logic.at> writes: > On Mo, 20 Mai 2013, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>>>> The build deps that I have are: >>>> libgd2-xpm-dev | libgd2-noxpm-dev => libtiff5-dev >>>> libgs-dev => libtiff4-dev >>>> How should this work out? >> The situation is that you can't have both libtiff4-dev and libtiff5-dev >> on the build dependency chain of any two packages at the same time. >> For now, what you have to do instead is to have the package that >> requires libtiff5-dev instead build-depend on libtiff5-alt-dev. The > But both are pulled in indirectly, so I cannot influence the necessary > libtiffN-dev deps that are pulled in. > DOes that mean now that I have to wait a few months until I can again > build texlive-bin? It means that ghostscript needs to be updated to do what Jay says. I think there are several options shy of waiting for a few months, such as making sure there's a bug filed against ghostscript about this problem to make sure the maintainer is aware (off-hand I don't see one), providing a patch, etc. Both of the maintainers of ghostscript are fairly active developers. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87obc5zl7t....@windlord.stanford.edu
