On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 07:02:17PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Or that gd needs to not tie its own transition to libtiff, and should go > > back to using libtiff4 until we're ready to do the tiff transition. > > JFTR I have no problem doing that, I didn't have any particular reason > to update to tiff 4.x. I just did update all B-D.
If you're going to update B-Ds, you might as well update to libtiff-dev rather than libtiff5-dev (no need for a real alternative since it only has a single provider in the archive at any one time). That way it'll all be binNMUable once it's time to transition. -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
