On 02/09/2014 11:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2014-02-09 05:14:17 -0800: >> Hi, >> >> While we can discuss during literally *years* about which init system to >> use, I think it's more productive to try to improve what we have in >> packages, so I'd like to talk about that. >> >> One thing that bothers me is that some of our sysv-rc init.d scripts >> aren't using /bin/sh as interpreter. >> >> For example, on my laptop, the only one that I have is MySQL. Then after >> fixing the shebang and running checkbashism, I can only see: >> >> possible bashism in /etc/init.d/mysql line 86 (echo -e): >> echo -e "$ps_alive processes alive and '$MYADMIN ping' resulted >> in\n$ping_output\n" | $ERR_LOGGER -p daemon.debug >> >> That's it... So that's a typical case where it should be possible to fix >> things, and get rid of bash. >> > > Is that really an important goal to spend our time on?
IMO, it all depends on how much non-sh scripts we have to fix. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52f7b8bb.50...@debian.org
