Le Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:39:09PM -0500, James McCoy a écrit : > > That wasn't clear to me in your previous messages, which is why I > presumed you were wanting someone to transition the consumers of the > file not the files themselves. That also seems like it's unnecessary to > do immediately since the consumers should be able to handle both paths > so the files can transition over time (as happened when > upstream-metadata.yaml was renamed, which still isn't complete).
At least for the work done on my side, what seems suggested above is not true: there was not double-support for both debian/upstream-metadata.yaml and debian/upstream-metadata at the same time. You are making assumptions that 1) are wrong and 2) support your views. Please review them more careully, especially when they look convenient for you. > If all you're concerned about is moving the files in the repositories, > I'll gladly do that. When will you start and when do you plan to finish ? Just do it please. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140211030429.gd15...@falafel.plessy.net
