On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 10:08 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:49:56AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > Additionally a very good proposal for a PID 1 program was in > > http://ewontfix.com/14/ "Broken by design: systemd", copied here for > > convenience: > > I like how people copy/paste blog articles. Did you read this article?
Of course I've read it. > It completely lacks detail and where it does, it is conflicting with > itself. > > E.g. "Reboot to Upgrade", while a bit later: "systemd's systemctl has a > daemon-reexec command to make systemd serialize its state, re-exec > itself". Meaning: reboot to upgrade is not needed, answer is given in > the same text. The objections to daemon-reexec are vague. I'll do some more reading on daemon-rexec before saying more. But: Don't you se the the current development is heading towards a Windows locked-in situation, and a reboot is necessary for every upgrade? kdbus, udev, gnome, network-manager, pulseaudio, wayland, (add to the list here) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1392112663.18980.46.ca...@g3620.my.own.domain
