On 2014-03-11, Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 06:09:40PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: >> I don't think this is a significant breach of the DFSG. > > Ah, but you do acknowledge this *is* a breach, even if a small one. > > > So this comes down to where the line is, like I said.
"As a Debian Developer, I will uphold the DFSG except where it is inconvenient" ? I actually think the DFSG is a great document and we shouldn't just stray from it because it is inconvenient. If I had to disregard the DFSG in some cases, I'd rather see rfc files in our files than sourceless javascripts. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/lfnufq$f0n$1...@ger.gmane.org
