Le Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 08:14:24PM +0000, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 06:09:40PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > We should stop this makework and get on with doing something useful.
> 
> Thanks for providing me with my 'word of the day' (makework) which seems
> to me to embody a growing collection of activities in Debian in modern
> times.

I agree.  Debian is too much about some people telling others to do useless
things.

We can not at the same time glorify ourselves for our number of packages
and our universality, and on the other hand expect that all the upstream
sources have the same level of cleanness as core works such as the Linux
kernel, GCC, the coreutils etc.

Tarball repacking is a practice from the tarball world.  Our future if we stay
in the tarball world is to be the rock-solid base package supermarket on which
others build the real thing, because our intolerance for minor defects will
make us unable to collect complex ensembles of specialised packages.

Long time ago, one could see the Debian CD as a state-of-the-art multipurpose
software repository useful on other systems as Debian itself, but now, more
people would not find it useful and would rather clone an upstream Git
repository than apt-get-sourcing the not-always latest source from our archive.

Therefore, more than ever, it is on the binary packages that we must commit on
the highest level.  The upstream source tarball matters much less.

Cheers,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140311220829.ga8...@falafel.plessy.net

Reply via email to