On May 11, Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@ieee.org> wrote: > Building two binary packages from a single source seems hackish, > since make and make-guile would require ./configure to be run again, > and each target of the ./debin/rules might need cleanup/restart. Not > unsolvable, but messy, and I do not have the motivation to do > that. Patches welcome, of course. I do this for the inn2 package and it has worked well for years. Another (much simpler) example is kmod, which build a deb and a udeb. If ./configure is not buggy and works when called from a build directory then building two binary packages from the same source is trivial.
Since it is installed on so many systems, I believe that a lean make package is still worthwhile. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
