On 26 September 2014 09:32, Matthias Urlichs <matth...@urlichs.de> wrote:

> True, the usecases overlap somewhat, but they're still different.
>
> I wouldn't want to install n-m (and the 30 libraries it depends on)
> in an initramfs, for instance.
>

Unless I am mistaken, I believe  systemd-networkd would be a lot better
suited the n-m on servers. Configuration is stored in plain text files, can
be recorded in etckeeper/git, etc.

I have nothing against either solution, but trying to solve all problems
with one tool isn't going to work, I think.
-- 
Brian May <br...@microcomaustralia.com.au>

Reply via email to