On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:32:26AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, > > Guido Günther: > > The overlap between n-m and systemd-networkd saddens me. n-m got > > support for team/bond interfaces, VLANs, etc a while ago and now we get > > to see yet another tool from systemd-* to redo this. > > True, the usecases overlap somewhat, but they're still different. > > I wouldn't want to install n-m (and the 30 libraries it depends on) > in an initramfs, for instance.
The amount of dependencies is being dealt with upstream by splitting things up. That said since n-m already interfaces with ifupdown and ifupdown, ifcfg and ifnet the proper way forward is to make it interface with systemd-networkd via a plugin as well. Cheers, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140926165940.gc2...@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org
