On 12/11/14 11:43, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:04:05AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> It is very sad to see that contributors sometimes feel that the only >> option for them is to resign. >> >> Would it be worthwhile giving people another option, for example, >> allowing a percentage of DDs to formally veto decisions? Would this be >> better than people leaving outright? > Can you elaborate which decisions and how many DDs could veto them? >
I didn't want to be too specific, to give other people a chance to make suggestions However, one possibility is that anybody maintaining an essential package and anybody who is a DPL delegate would be able to veto. The implication is that somebody can still win a GR against the veto, but they do so knowing that they will have to find somebody else to maintain some essential packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54633fa7.1050...@pocock.pro
