On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:48:29PM +0000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:05:13AM +0100, Bj??rn Mork wrote: > > m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes: > > > On Nov 17, Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> wrote: > > >> > This is what many still (retorically) wonder about: we the systemd > > >> > maintainers did not reject that change, > > >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=15;bug=746578 > > > Please try to be less selective in your quoting: the issue was still > > > being discussed. > > I see. So any systemd bug with a 'wontfix' tag is still considered open > > for discussion? That's good to know. Thanks. > > Isn't any (open) bug tagged wontfix still "open for discussion"? If you've > got new information, or a new approach that the maintainer might prefer, > you can post it to the bug and discuss it with the maintainer...
It appears to be a misnomer then. I read 'wontfix' as "I'm not going to to fix it as I don't see it as a bug." Or am I confusing an open wontfix with a closed wontfix? -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." --- Malcolm X -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141118034838.GD7745@tal