Hallo, * Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [Tue, Feb 17 2015, 04:28:04PM]: > so to summarise: > > * the use of libselinux1 is dormant (i.e. whilst you can't remove it > without inconvenience, its use is entirely optional, right from the > kernel level) > * its development and documentation is rational and well-researched > * the timeline behind its introduction was done in a respectful and > reasonable way
> now let's compare that to the situation that we find ourselves in with > libsystemd0: Talk only about you, please. The "yourselves" of yours seems to lack basic research skills. > * the use of libsystemd0 is MANDATORY and EXCLUSIONARY (everywhere > except slackware and FreeBSD) Wrong. It is also dormant, except for a little function that applications call. > * its development is a moving target and the documentation of the > roadmap is informal and sparse. And that little piece of code had just six commits according to: git log ./src/libsystemd/sd-daemon/sd-daemon.c | grep commit and most of them are minor changes. That's a HELL OF MOVING TARGET, yeah. Now, enjoy the feel of being my personal hero, take a cookie, STFU and go away. Thanks. Deleted the rest of unfunded crap. Regards, Eduard. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150217170822.ga7...@rotes76.wohnheim.uni-kl.de
