Nathan Schulte <nmschu...@gmail.com> writes: > On 02/17/2015 11:49 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
>> libsystemd0_is_ dynamically loaded, precisely so that userspace >> applications can make the decision at runtime as to what to do. > What about dynamically linked? Maybe Luke means dynamic linking > (necessitating dynamic loading) instead? It's already dynamically linked too. If the argument is that it should be opened with dlopen at runtime, I'm quite confident that there are *many* people on debian-devel who have worked with shared libraries and can spell out many reasons why that's a horrible idea. And it serves no practical, useful purpose. (Removing every package whose name contains the string "systemd" is not a practical, useful purpose. It's just silly.) What Luke spent thousands of words advocating for is basically what the systemd upstream has *already done* with libsystemd0. One could even say that it's a primary *purpose* of that library. So, yay, I guess? The world is much better than you had thought and already as good as the compromise position you thought you could get! -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87k2zfvqqp....@hope.eyrie.org
