Hi, On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:27:43AM +0200, Daniel Stender wrote: > On 02.04.2015 23:43, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 11:25:44PM +0200, Daniel Stender wrote: > >>>> * Package name : graph-tool > >>> If it is a python library/module, should't it be in the python- > >>> namespace ? > >> Sorry, I've forgot to mention, the binary would be: > >> python3-graph-tool.
Hmmm, this sounds unusual as well to me. Could you please clarify whether it is a python3 module or rater a user oriented application? In case of the later please stick to graph-tool as the binary name. For user applications it does not make any sense to add the programming language to the package name. > > The source package should still be python-graph-tool really. Unless > > it's a standalone application on its own, it helps to keep things > > tidy. > > That's a point. All right. Or you stick to your original source package name graph-tool which sounds fine for an application package. As an additional hint: The package sounds like interesting for the Debian Science project. Please check whether it might fit into one or more tasks out of http://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/ Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150406065532.gd29...@an3as.eu