Yes I think the package would fit fine into Debian Science. Unfortunately, another thing came into the way and I don't have enough time to bring this into Debian yet.
Not to block this now, I've changed the ITP to RFP [1]. Tiago would maintain it, maybe somebody wants to sponsor ... DS [1] http://bugs.debian.org/781765 On 06.04.2015 08:55, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:27:43AM +0200, Daniel Stender wrote: >> On 02.04.2015 23:43, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 11:25:44PM +0200, Daniel Stender wrote: >>>>>> * Package name : graph-tool >>>>> If it is a python library/module, should't it be in the python- >>>>> namespace ? >>>> Sorry, I've forgot to mention, the binary would be: >>>> python3-graph-tool. > > Hmmm, this sounds unusual as well to me. Could you please clarify > whether it is a python3 module or rater a user oriented application? In > case of the later please stick to graph-tool as the binary name. For > user applications it does not make any sense to add the programming > language to the package name. > >>> The source package should still be python-graph-tool really. Unless >>> it's a standalone application on its own, it helps to keep things >>> tidy. >> >> That's a point. All right. > > Or you stick to your original source package name graph-tool which > sounds fine for an application package. > > As an additional hint: The package sounds like interesting for the > Debian Science project. Please check whether it might fit into one > or more tasks out of > > http://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/ > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > -- http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB1CA89EA3B74376761DB915E09AF4DF5182C8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55226502.4090...@danielstender.com