On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 18:25:21 +0100, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote: >On Jan 02, Joerg Jaspert <jo...@debian.org> wrote: >> No, /etc can be nicely ro. That is, /, /usr, /etc, ... can be. The log >> storage and the user homes, as well as a tmp filesystem rw, rest ro. >> Works nicely, I have 4 of such systems running. >Just to be clear: on a merged /usr system nothing prevents you from >having /home and /var on standalone file systems and keeping the root >file system (eventually with /usr on it) read only.
What is the "upgrade path" for an older system that has /usr split off? Will it just stop being bootable after upgrading? Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834