On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Iustin Pop <ius...@debian.org> wrote:
> On 2016-01-03 12:59:01, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> I don't like usr-merge because it goes against my historical
>> expectation that "/{,s}bin" be separate from their /usr namesakes and
>> contain binaries required for boot.
>
> OK, so adjust your historical expectation. It's not a technical issue,
> it's simply a matter of expectations, which have no reason to stay the
> same for ever.Did you read the next para of my email?!
