* Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> [160727 20:04]: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 18:02:32 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > Shouldn't this > > dependency only be declared at some other level (libdbus, GDBus,...)? > > I think this would have to be a new dbus-session metapackage, unless > I'm missing something. dbus is the wrong place, and so are all the > obvious libraries.
Do you mean metapackage or virtual package? Wouldn't a virtual package be exactly the right thing for this? Then dbus-user-session and dbus-x11 would each "Provides: dbus-session" and no additional real package is required. Maybe I do not understand what is being suggested. ...Marvin
