Hi, (Sorry for piping in so late to the party here)
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > But maybe to talk about this option: what would speak against changing the > "nmu" command of wanna-build to also add an option that allows setting a > timestamp, or even let wanna-build generate that timestamp itself (from the > time it processes the "nmu" command) and then pass it to sbuild via a > not-yet-existing --binNMU-timestamp option? Wanna-build has a "State-Change" date: wouter@wuiet:~$ wanna-build -A powerpc --info nbd nbd: Package : nbd Version : 1:3.14-4 Builder : buildd_powerpc-porpora State : Installed Section : admin Priority : source Installed-Version : 1:3.14-4 Previous-State : Uploaded State-Change : 2016-11-21 23:13:18.744533 Build-time : 9255 CalculatedPri : 50 component : main Distribution : sid Notes : out-of-date Old-Failed : -------------------- 1:2.9.23-1 -------------------- fails test suite State-Days : 9 State-Time : 835808 Success-build-time : 366 Why not use that? -- < ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules, and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too. -- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12