On 16/04/19 at 08:52 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 05:35:40PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 04:55:12PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > biococoa (U) does not use Debhelper (no compat level found) > > > (source version: 2.2.2-4) > > > biococoa (U) should switch to dh. Current build system: cdbs > > > (source version: 2.2.2-4) > > > > | % grep cdbs -r biococoa-2.2.2 > > | biococoa-2.2.2/debian/rules:include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/gnustep.mk > > | biococoa-2.2.2/debian/rules:include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/gnumakefile.mk > > | biococoa-2.2.2/debian/control:Build-Depends: cdbs, > > | biococoa-2.2.2/debian/changelog: dh_installsystemd instead -> that's > > a cdbs issue) > > | biococoa-2.2.2/debian/changelog: * debian/control (Build-Depends): Add > > cdbs and quilt. Drop gnustep-make > > This explains the cdbs smelling (and I loved to get rid of this but > this needs to be fixed by gnustep.mk). But in how far is > > "no compat level found" > > sensible?
That's because, once lintian sees that the package does not use debhelper or cdbs, it returns from debhelper.pm and thus doesn't reach the point where the tag for debhelper-compat-level (which is an addition in my lintian fork) is emitted. L.