On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 2:48 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > DEP-12 is declared as "Work in progress" (without any progress since 5 > years) while DEP-5 is well established and decided. Charles and I > invented d/u/metadata to store publication information and it turned out > that there is other sensible information about upstream that can be > stored there as well. I'd vote against any duplication of information > in any way. So as long as Name and Contact are defined in DEP-5 it > should not be in DEP-12.
These fields seem like they belong in DEP-12 more than DEP-5. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
