On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 05:47:24PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 2:48 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > > > DEP-12 is declared as "Work in progress" (without any progress since 5 > > years) while DEP-5 is well established and decided. Charles and I > > invented d/u/metadata to store publication information and it turned out > > that there is other sensible information about upstream that can be > > stored there as well. I'd vote against any duplication of information > > in any way. So as long as Name and Contact are defined in DEP-5 it > > should not be in DEP-12. > > These fields seem like they belong in DEP-12 more than DEP-5.
Finally that's a matter of taste where the fields belong to. As long as there is no decision including a change of DEP-5 and a finalised DEP-12 I'd consider any change as its currently done as premature. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de