Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Git Packaging Round 2: SHOULD Not or MUSt NOT Github"):
> Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
>
> > Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Git Packaging Round 2: SHOULD Not or
> > MUSt NOT Github"):
> >> Unfortunately, I believe you are in the [wrong] when judging
>
> Ian placed the word "wrong" in my mouth replacing the word "rough" from
> my original mail. I disagree with that characterization of what I said
> in the strongest possible terms.
I'm sorry, I genuinely thought you had made a typo. The sentence
Unfortunately, I believe you are in the rough when judging rough
consensus on this issue.
didn't make sense to me. I should have stared at it for longer and
then maybe I would have seen what you meant.
> When I say that Ian is in the rough, I mean that I think there is
> not a perfect consensus on the issue, and that Ian holds an view
> that is inconsistent with what consensus exists.
Thanks for the explanation.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
