On 1/2/20 5:13 PM, Ansgar wrote: > Thomas Goirand writes: >> My proposal is for Debian to standardize on: >> /bin/tmpfiles >> and: >> /usr/bin/sysusers > > Why rename things?
I don't mind either ways, but... ... after this discussion, it looks like we would prefer: /bin/systemd-tmpfiles and /bin/systemd-sysusers For this, we need systemd to use update-alternatives for them then, so that opentmpfiles & opensysusers do not need to use dpkg divertion. See: https://bugs.debian.org/947847 >> I'm not sure why >> there's both /bin/systemd-sysusers and /usr/bin/systemd-sysusers, and >> which one should be used. > > For the same reason there is /bin/bash and /usr/bin/bash probably? > > Ansgar I'd like to understand how /usr/bin/systemd-sysusers got into my system, when others are saying they don't have it. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)