On 2020/03/05 00:47, Sam Hartman wrote: > Anthony> Files: > Anthony> debian/missing-sources/pydoctor/templates/bootstrap.css > Anthony> pydoctor/templates/bootstrap.min.css Copyright: 2011-2015 > Anthony> Twitter, Inc. Embedded copy of normalize.css v3.0.2: > Anthony> 2011-2014 Nicolas Gallagher License: Expat Comment: These > Anthony> files are copies of vanilla Bootstrap v3.3.4 CSS files, > Anthony> identical to those distributed on Bootstrap CDN: * > Anthony> https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.4/css/bootstrap.css > Anthony> * > Anthony> > https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.4/css/bootstrap.min.css > > Is the css file actually source code though? > At least for bootstrap 4, the source code is in sas and the css is not > the preferred form for modification. > I think bootstrap has been using sas for a long time, so I suspect css > is not source code for bootstrap 3 either.
That's not really an issue in the context of the original question, Anthony's answer is the correct approach here, that is, patch the application (or use a symlink or whatever) to use the CSS file provided by the libjs-bootstrap4 package. Using the CSS file from the libjs-bootstrap4 doesn't present any kind of DFSG issue since that package builds the CSS file from the original sass sources, see: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/twitter-bootstrap4/-/blob/master/debian/rules -Jonathan
