so maybe we just add nano-tiny as an option to vim-tiny. because we understand vim is not newbie friendly, but for all the old hands, nano is not friendly to us. 234K is a small price to pay.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 7:27 PM Guus Sliepen <g...@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 01:02:47PM +0000, Wookey wrote: > > > I hadn't realised how fat nano is (not the only consideration of > > course, but zile is very good on this measure and surprisingly > > functionfull). > > You are comparing apples with oranges! The nano package comes with a lot > of help files and translations. You need to compare things to nano-tiny: > > > Instaled sizes: > > zile: 365K > > busybox: 786K > > vim-tiny: 1547K > > nvi: 1605K > > busybox-static: 2045K > > nano: 2469K > > nano-tiny: 234K > > -- > Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, > Guus Sliepen <g...@debian.org> >
