On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:58:51AM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote: > 1) The person who introduces a GR is treated differently than anyone who > introduces an amendment in ways that are odd, and are subject to > strategic abuse.
This asymmetry guards against a GR discussion being allowed to continue indefinitely as a result of a small minority of developers repeatedly introducing amendments that prolong the discussion period. Whether malicious or not, I think this is important to guard against. IMHO, it's better to have a vote quickly on a limited set of GR options, with the possibility of a second GR if there is sufficient dissatisfaction with the first GR outcome, than to have community energy spent endlessly on crafting a perfect set of options before we take a vote. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
