On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 12:31:51PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >... > IMHO, it's better to have a vote quickly on a limited set of GR options, > with the possibility of a second GR if there is sufficient dissatisfaction > with the first GR outcome, than to have community energy spent endlessly on > crafting a perfect set of options before we take a vote.
You are saying that whenever there are 6 DDs who don't like the outcome of the first GR, they should start a second GR that repeals the first GR and replaces it with something better as soon as the results of the first GR are posted. Or start a second GR before the first GR has been voted on, as nearly happened during your GR due to the shortened discussion period. I would rather have one discussion that covers all aspects of the topic, with all options on one ballot, and then have the topic settled instead of having an endless succession of GRs around the same topic. cu Adrian
