On 10/03/22 at 23:23 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:49:50PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >... > > For packages in (1.1) and (1.2), I propose to file Severity: wishlist > > bugs using the following template: > > > > ------------------------------------------------------>8 > > Subject: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format > > Severity: wishlist > > Usertags: format1.0 > > > > Dear maintainer, > > > > This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in > > bookworm. Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has > > many > > advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; > > (2) > > this contributes to standardization of packaging practices. > > > > Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software > > could maybe benefit from a refresh. It might be a good opportunity to > > look at other aspects as well. > > > > This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00074.html > >... > > josch already has tested patches for more than half of the packages, > starting by submitting bugs for these packages with these patches will > avoid work for maintainers and result in faster fixing of the bugs.
I just sent a followup to the relevant bugs (it's the "trivial fix" column on https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/format10.cgi ) Thanks Lucas
