2022, ഏപ്രിൽ 20 1:52:45 PM IST, Ansgar <ans...@43-1.org>ൽ എഴുതി
>On Wed, 2022-04-20 at 12:55 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> liberated.computer it is refurbished and some components like wifi
>> cards replaced so it works with 100% free software.
>
>No, it doesn't. It just *hides* the fact that you use non-free
>software. If you are happy with that, fine, but please don't claim it
>uses 100% free software.

So are our official images not 100% free? If so what are we even proposing to 
change?

This question was about a desire to ship libre version of the image with a 
laptop that can work with that image. Someone asked if such a laptop exist in 
reality and I pointed out to someone doing that actually.

>And everything from keyboard, mice, storage (SD cards, SSD, rotating
>disks, controllers), ... has firmware. I don't expect them to have done
>much about that. Of course some devices come with preinstalled
>firmware, so it's easy to ignore the firmware exists. However, that
>does not "free" you from the restrictions of proprietary software that
>comes from using non-free firmware in any way compared to having the OS
>supply the firmware data.

There are many layers of issues regarding firmware. I did not oppose creating a 
non free image. I was only asking to keep creating the free image for those who 
want it.

https://forums.puri.sm/t/does-respects-your-freedom-certification-allow-updating-of-proprietary-firmware/9484/6

This has a pretty in depth analysis. I tend to agree with the criteria FSF set 
for RYF certification relating to firmware.

"The rational is that the particular bit pattern which constitutes the firmware 
is relatively fixed, and so is essentially hardware. Of course, just like the 
company need not glue the case shut to prevent the end user from using a 
shunt-mod to overclock the GPU, they similarly don’t have to clip off the JTAG 
pins to prevent the user from rearranging those bits however they like. They 
just must not expect the user to do so (or have software on the machine to do 
it for the user automatically) in order to have a correctly functioning 
machine."

Specifically this,
They just must not expect the user to do so (or have software on the machine to 
do it for the user automatically) in order to have a correctly functioning 
machine.

So a person with RYF certified hardware should be a able to use an image 
without the proprietary firmware. As I already clarified, I just want to keep 
the free image option and not opposed to the separate non-free image.

>Ansgar
>

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Reply via email to