On 02/07/2024 00:54, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Monday, July 1, 2024 6:46:06 PM EDT Alec Leamas wrote:
If you switch hats for a moment: have you any advice for upstream in this situation?
8763.5.10
Yes, I have had a similar idea using 10000 instead of 8763 to make it stand out less. In my eyes, this is worse and will lead to that the package versions does not match the "public" version like 5.10.2.
But if the list agrees that this is the correct solution so be it. To be honest, it might be a hard sell upstream.
Next build is: 8763.5.10~8764
Why? --alec
