Hi, >>"Darren" == Darren Stalder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darren> Uh, Manoj, if you don't want less to interpret things for, Darren> just don't use lessopen. If you still want to use it, you can Darren> just edit the lessopen script. I know that. The accepted way of using less used to be to use a upstream filter. Right now, it is done like so: ______________________________________________________________________ __> printenv | grep -i less PAGER=less -ciM LESSOPEN=|lessopen %s LESS=-ciMP?f%f :std in .?n?m(file %i of %m) ..?ltline %lt :byte %bB?s/%s ..?e(END) ?x- Next\: %x.:?pB%pB\%..%t LESSCHARSET=latin1 __> eval $(lesspipe) __> printenv | grep -i less PAGER=less -ciM LESSCLOSE=/usr/bin/lesspipe '%s' '%s' LESSOPEN=| /usr/bin/lesspipe '%s' LESS=-ciMP?f%f :std in .?n?m(file %i of %m) ..?ltline %lt :byte %bB?s/%s ..?e(END) ?x- Next\: %x.:?pB%pB\%..%t LESSCHARSET=latin1 ______________________________________________________________________ See how the distribution now uses lesspipe? I am bemoaning the fact that lesspipe is not directly usable by me anymore, since all the stuff got added to it. manoj -- Aren't you glad you're not getting all the government you pay for now? Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/> Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]