"Rev. Joseph Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 02:22:39PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> > >> On the contrary. This is an excellent point you made. ncftp
> > >> is now under GPL!! Yay! libreadline not being under LGPL worked!
> > >> Hurrah!=20
> > >=20
> > > Um, 2.x is GPL. 3.x is not, afaik.
> >=20
> > Certainly the version of 3 in hamm is not linked against readline, which
> > would suggest not.
> >=20
> > In fact, it makes 3 in the hamm almost useless, IMHO - what is the use of
> > ncftp without history and completions? They're the main reason I use it.=
> ..
>
> 3 was yanked from hamm (hardly usable) and 2 was put in main. I think it
> uses an epoch, which should make it install even though versionwise it's
> older.
Hm.. I'm the ncftp maintainer and the version in hamm/non-free should
definitely be removed. I'll file a bug right away.
Martin.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
