On Mon, Apr 20, 1998 at 11:47:20PM -0700, Guy Maor wrote:

> Modifying libc to catch common security goals is a laudable goal, but
> such a libc should go to experimental.

Why change libc? Isn't there a kernel patch that makes /tmp safe? Why isn't
no-one using it?

-- 
Joh 3:16


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to