[ Still not wanting to get into the discussion, honest, just making random points ]
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What is your point? The .deb packaging of source doesn't deal with > > source dependencies any better than the current source package. > > Sure it does. You put the dependencies on the Depends: line of the > control file. You can do that in the .dsc file too, but it suffers from the same problem, i.e. what to do with source dependencies like svgalibg1-dev, which are arch-specific when .dsc files (or source debs, whatever) are arch-independent. -- James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]