[ Still not wanting to get into the discussion, honest, just making
  random points ]

Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > What is your point? The .deb packaging of source doesn't deal with
> > source dependencies any better than the current source package.
> 
> Sure it does.  You put the dependencies on the Depends: line of the
> control file.

You can do that in the .dsc file too, but it suffers from the same
problem, i.e. what to do with source dependencies like svgalibg1-dev,
which are arch-specific when .dsc files (or source debs, whatever) are
arch-independent.

-- 
James


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to