> > Sure it does. You put the dependencies on the Depends: line of the > > control file.
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can do that in the .dsc file too, but it suffers from the same > problem, i.e. what to do with source dependencies like svgalibg1-dev, > which are arch-specific when .dsc files (or source debs, whatever) are > arch-independent. Sure: we do need to fix our source packaging system. I don't agree with that very strongly. But until it's fixed, I don't object to our coping with some of our stronger needs for source packages (for example: pcmcia-source, which apparently must be compiled against a specific instance of kernel-source) to be packaged in .deb format. More specifically, I don't think that late in the frozen stage is the right time to introduce a new package format requirement for hamm. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
