Hi Bastien, On Thu, 2026-08-13 at 12:53 +0200, Bastien Roucaries wrote: > In order to ease the user/devel experience I want for isa-support to create > test for forky baseline > > For now I test for armhf: > > armv8-support > CPU feature checking - require ARMv8 > > neon-support
Not sure I understand this. You want to raise armhf to ARMv8? Why would anyone then install a 32-bit port when they could just use the 64-bit port in the first place? > For armhf/arm64 (will like to know if it exist supported cpu without crc) > > armv8crc-support > CPU feature checking - require ARMv8CRC What's the advantage of requiring ARMv8CRC? > For amd64/i386 (i will like to only use psABI defintion so > > sse3-support > vérification de caractéristique de CPU – besoin de SSE3 > sse4.1-support > CPU feature checking - require SSE4.1 > sse4.2-support > SSE4.2 > x86-64-v2-support > CPU feature checking - require x86-64-v2 > x86-64-v3-support > CPU feature checking - require x86-64-v3 Isn't that something that should be done using hwcaps support? > for ppc/ppc64 > > altivec-support POWER8 already has AltiVec. For powerpc and ppc64, AltiVec is not required in the baseline because there are some embedded systems that people use that don't support AltiVec despite being more recent than some of the first AltiVec CPUs. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
