> Hi,
> >>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
>  Dale> Epochs are not, were never, intended to be used for this
>  Dale> purpose. They are only for dealing with upstream renumbering
>  Dale> that would cause conflicts.
> 
>       I thought this was all about the upstream releasing
>  pre-releases with versions that would not order right for Debian? If
>  that is indeed the case, then this is precisely what epochs were
>  designed for.

I like the way that the ``clever'' hack of sticking R on the end of libc6's 
version, confused the hell out of APT.

Well, it made _me_ laugh :-)

I wonder if an epoch would have caused the same problem...

Cheers, Phil.



--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to