On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > > [1] ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/docs/legal.txt > > Redistribution of this release is permitted as follows, or by > mutual agreement: > > (a) In free-of-charge or at-cost distributions by non-profit concerns;
This sounds like Debian and the ftp servers. > (b) In free-of-charge distributions by for-profit concerns; Pine doesn't want a company making money from Pine/Pico/Pilot... > (c) Inclusion in a CD-ROM collection of free-of-charge, shareware, or > non-proprietary software for which a fee may be charged for the > packaged distribution. ... but it is ok to charge for a distribution if you are producing CD's. > The above also makes it non-free. ? If Pine is non-free, then it is non-free. Why does non-free == no modified binaries? later, Bruce