On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Bruce Sass wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > > > > > [1] ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/docs/legal.txt > > > > Redistribution of this release is permitted as follows, or by > > mutual agreement: > > > > (a) In free-of-charge or at-cost distributions by non-profit concerns; > > This sounds like Debian and the ftp servers. > > > (b) In free-of-charge distributions by for-profit concerns; > > Pine doesn't want a company making money from Pine/Pico/Pilot... > > > (c) Inclusion in a CD-ROM collection of free-of-charge, shareware, or > > non-proprietary software for which a fee may be charged for the > > packaged distribution. > > ... but it is ok to charge for a distribution if you are producing CD's. > > > The above also makes it non-free. > > ? If Pine is non-free, then it is non-free. > > Why does non-free == no modified binaries? > Because modifiability, specificly the right to distribute modified binaries, is a DFSG requirement.
Dwarf -- _-_-_-_-_- Author of "The Debian Linux User's Guide" _-_-_-_-_-_- aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (850) 656-9769 Flexible Software 11000 McCrackin Road e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tallahassee, FL 32308 _-_-_-_-_-_- If you don't see what you want, just ask _-_-_-_-_-_-_-