Avery Pennarun wrote: >What if someone gets hold of the Linux kernel and uses it to guide nuclear >missiles? (Well, at least they have to share their changes with us :))
Only if they distribute the control systems :> >Seriously, slander is slander, and it's rude, and people will know it when >they see it. Furthermore, if people want to parody Debian (including the >logo) they'll do so regardless of the logo license, and Debian doesn't have >enough money to sue them about it. Besides, did anyone bother to register a >trademark? Aren't parodies specifically allowed under international copyright law? >A license that says "this logo should only be used when referring >specifically to Debian" is plenty and probably still unenforceable. Yeah, I don't think it should be more than one sentence. Perhaps: "You are licensed to use and distribute modified versions of this logo to refer to or advertise debian." Note that this fails DFSG point #6. I believe this was the original intent. -- Robert Woodcock - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It's like a love-hate relationship, but without the love." -- jwz, on linux