> I agree with James Treacy's observation that we will probably need two > logos: one logo with a liberal license that people can just freely, and > another, more restricted logo for things like official CD's and so.
This seems like a logical solution. Having the official "Debian" logo could perhaps be more generic, thus used to deal with the issue of what happens if Debian eventually becomes largely a hurd distribution or takes some other unknown directional turn in the future. One question I had was out of the two options you list above, which category do you see our present logo falling into: the liberal license or the official logo? Or would this new logo contest be used to choose logos for both categories? -- Regards, | Why would anyone want to run an operating . | system that is open source and is developed Randy | by hundreds of hackers worldwide? Find out ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | why at http://www.golgotha.net/why-linux/
