On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Steve Greenland wrote: > On 25-Jan-99, 19:06 (CST), Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree with James Treacy's observation that we will probably need two > > logos: one logo with a liberal license that people can just freely, and > > another, more restricted logo for things like official CD's and so. > > To phrase this in another way: we will have a logo that everyone can > > slap onto their webpage, t-shirts, posters, etc., and a logo that can be > > used for `official' products, like CD's made using our own iso-images. > > Sorry, I think this is a bad idea: > > 1. We have to agree on *two* logos :-). > > 2. Far more importantly, it fractures the identity of the logo, which > is one of the major points of *having* a logo. > > 3. It creates a first-class and second-class logo.
Nah. A 'submission' to the contest is a pair of logos. Linked to each stylistically, one of them says 'official' or something. Jules /----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\ | Jelibean aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 6 Evelyn Rd | | Jules aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Richmond, Surrey | | Julian Bean | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TW9 2TF *UK* | +----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+ | War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. | | When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. | \----------------------------------------------------------------------/
