> [ redundant emacs versions ] > > Well, I'll suggest that for potato. It will start a nice flame-war on > > debian-devel "emacs vs. xemacs". > > > Hey, that's just what we need at this stage for *slink*! >:-) > > Okay, let's be serious again: unfortunately this actually means that > some of the most obvious installation profiles of slink stay to be > unnecessarily bloated. I consider this to be a bad move because the > initial install is something like Debian's advertisement plate (or > visiting card) and the installation of three emacs variants gives a > rather bad impression IMHO. I mean, who would *really* want to have > *three* emacs variants installed at once and above all right at the > first installation stage?
Especially given I have never been able to get emacs19 and emacs20 to coexist on a debian system: emacs19 works, but it's config script always fails, and so it is flagged as 1/2 configured. I only use it for reading GROGGS, so I guess that doesn't matter too much. Matthew -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steward of the Cambridge Tolkien Society Selwyn College Computer Support http://www.cam.ac.uk/CambUniv/Societies/tolkien/ http://pick.sel.cam.ac.uk/