On May 20, Craig Brozefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> With this scheme scripts can't be easily disabled. >mv /etc/network/eth0.postup.leafnode /etc/network/off.eth0.postup.leafnode dpkg would not be happy.
-- ciao, Marco
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network shaleh
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network Joseph Carter
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network David Corbin
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network Marco d'Itri
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network Massimo Dal Zotto
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network Craig Brozefsky
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network Marco d'Itri
- Re: better /etc/init.d/net... Joseph Carter
- Re: better /etc/init.d/net... Craig Brozefsky
- Re: better /etc/init.d... Adam Di Carlo
- Re: better /etc/init.d... Marco d'Itri
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network Erik
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network David Bristel
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network Marco d'Itri
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network Goswin Brederlow
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network Massimo Dal Zotto
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network Michel Onstein
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network shaleh
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network Marco d'Itri
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network Massimo Dal Zotto
